Events 2020 - 2021
Lecture Series on Neoliberalism
Sandro Mezzadra, University of Bologna:
“The Politics of Coronavirus: Investigating the Future of Neoliberalism.”
Friday, October 16, 2020, 2 pm, on Zoom. Short presentation, followed by discussion.
Abstract: The current pandemic challenges established ways of life in many parts of the world and there is a need to take stock of its political implications. While it is easy to see that neoliberalism played a key role in facilitating the spread of Coronavirus and in exacerbating its impact, the scenarios emerging from the management of the pandemic are more difficult to predict. Malthusianism and social Darwinism are definitely characteristic of current developments in several countries and regions, while elsewhere we witness a new emphasis on welfare and public health. Focusing on Europe, the talk will analyze a set of shifts in the macroeconomic governmental framework asking whether it is possible to speak of an emerging “post-neoliberal” conjuncture. In order to test this hypothesis and its implications, which are not necessarily “positive,” the very notion of neoliberalism will be discussed once again.
Sandro Mezzadra is Professor of Political Theory at the University of Bologna and is adjunct research fellow at the Institute for Culture and Society of Western Sydney University. His work has centered on the relations between globalization, migration, and political processes, on contemporary capitalism, as well as on postcolonial theory and criticism. Among his books: Diritto di fuga. Migrazioni, cittadinanza, globalizzazione (2006), La condizione postcoloniale. Storia e politica nel presente globale (2008), In the Marxian Workshops: Producing Subjects (2018), and Un mondo da guadagnare. Per una teoria politica del presente (2020) . With Brett Neilson, he is the author of Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor (2013) and of The Politics of Operations: Excavating Contemporary Capitalism (2019).
Text under discussion: Sandro Mezzadra, "The Politics of Coronavirus. Investigating the Future of Neoliberalism." Recommended reading: Sandro Mezzadra and Brett Neilson, The Politics of Operations (chapter 6).
Verónica Gago, University of Buenos Aires:
"Neoliberalism and Violence: Lessons from the Feminist Revolts."
Friday, October 30, 2020, 2 pm, on Zoom. Short presentation, followed by discussion.
Abstract: In Latin America, the origin of neoliberalism is indisputably violent. Neoliberalism was consolidated through dictatorships. Latin America, in other words, presents a deep archive for examining the relationship between neoliberalism and fascism. This helps us see neoliberalism’s “novelty” through a different perspective—one that strips off its liberal and even progressive clothing. Some questions that I want to examine are: How to identify neoliberalism’s forms of persistence and recombination and simultaneously to resist the assumption that neoliberalism can eliminate all antagonisms by equating life and capital? What kinds of antagonism does neoliberalism incorporate and in response to what conflicts does it mutate? I aim to show why the collective subjectivation deployed by feminist revolts today—in their popular, indigenous, village, dissident, queer, black, and other compositions and territorialities—is a key component in the battle against neoliberalism’s power of limitless mutation and the utopia of financialization.
Verónica Gago teaches political science at the Universidad de Buenos Aires and is professor of sociology at the Instituto de Altos Estudios, Universidad Nacional de San Martín. She is also researcher at the National Council of Research. Gago is the author of Neoliberalism from Below: Popular Pragmatics and Baroque Economies (2017) and La potencia feminista. O el deseo de cambiarlo todo (2019; forthcoming in English with Verso). She is the author of numerous articles on neoliberalism, social movements, and feminism published in journals and books throughout Latin America, Europe, and the United States.
Two texts are under discussion: Verónica Gago, "Financialization of Popular Life and the Extractive Operations of Capital: A Perspective from Argentina.” Gago and Mezzadra, “A Critique of the Extractive Operations of Capital: Toward an Expanded Concept of Extractivism.”
Gabriel Rockhill, Villanova University:
“Counter-History of Fascism & Liberalism.”
Friday, November 13, 2020, 2 pm, on Zoom. Short presentation, followed by discussion.
Abstract: This series of short articles proposes a counter-history of fascism and liberalism from an historical materialist perspective. It begins by examining the ideology of fascist exceptionalism, which attempts to reduce fascism to a single place and time in order to dissimulate its broad and deep historical role in imposing and maintaining capitalist socioeconomic relations. It then takes on the logic of false antagonisms inherent in the purported opposition between liberalism and fascism by demonstrating how the classic examples of fascism in Europe arose within the institutional framework of bourgeois democracies. The series goes on to explore how the United States, a self-declared liberal democracy, far from defeating fascism in WWII, actually contributed to its internationalization (through the semi-clandestine construction of a global network of anti-communist fascist militants and leaders). The concluding article proposes that we replace the one-state-one-government paradigm with a theoretical framework within which liberalism and fascism are understood as modes of governance that often operate simultaneously within the same state, but that target different populations and are unequally distributed across space and time.
Gabriel Rockhill is a philosopher, cultural critic, and activist. He is the founding director of the Critical Theory Workshop and Professor of Philosophy at Villanova University. His recent books include Radical History & the Politics of Art (2014), Interventions in Contemporary Thought: History, Politics, Aesthetics (2016), and Counter-History of the Present: Untimely Interrogations into Globalization, Technology, Democracy (2017). In addition to his scholarly work, he is engaged in extra-academic activities in the art and activist worlds, and his writings have appeared in venues like The New York Times, the Los Angeles Review of Books, Truthout, CounterPunch, Libération, and Médiapart. For more information: gabrielrockhill.com.
A Book That Changed My Mind
We usually invite speakers to hear how they defend a thesis, a position, a point of view. We expect them to have made up their minds about books and ideas. In this series, we try something different: We ask our guests to tell us how they have changed their minds. Which book urged them into this change? What was it about the book to have incited a change? And how did this change come about? Did it happen because of what the book argued or despite it? Did it occur happily or grudgingly?
Sianne Ngai (University of Chicago), on Fredric Jameson's The Political Unconscious.
Wednesday, Dec. 9, 2020, 4:30 - 5:30 pm ET, on Zoom. (No recording available)
Sianne Ngai, someone whose books have prompted many of us to change our minds about aesthetic experience, speaks about Fredric Jameson’s The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act, first published in 1981.
Sianne Ngai is Professor of English at the University of Chicago. She is the author of Ugly Feelings; Our Aesthetic Categories: Zany, Cute, Interesting, which won the Modern Language Association’s James Russell Lowell Prize; and Theory of the Gimmick: Aesthetic Judgment and Capitalist Form, published just this year by Harvard University Press. Her work has been translated into multiple languages, and she has received fellowships from the Institute of Advanced Study in Berlin and the American Council of Learned Societies.
Robert Pogue Harrison (Stanford University), on Giambattista Vico's New Science.
Tuesday, January 26, 2021, 4 - 5 pm ET, on Zoom. To view the recording, click here.
Robert Harrison is a literary critic and cultural historian whose work respects few canonical or generic limits. Yet as he ranges widely, he is guided by some essential lines of thinking, many of which emerge from Vico's New Science, first published in 1725.
Robert Pogue Harrison is the Rosina Pierotti Professor in French & Italian Literature at Stanford University. He has written many books, among them Forests: The Shadow of Civilization, which has appeared in five language; The Dominion of the Dead, which deals with the relationship various cultures maintain with the dead; and Juvenescence: A Cultural History of Our Age, published in 2014 by the University of Chicago Press. He has also served as host of the radio talk show "Entitled Opinions." Harrison has been called "the single most significant writer in the humanities today."
Homi Bhabha (Harvard University), on Walter Benjamin’s Arcades Project.
Wednesday, February 17, 2021, 4 - 5 pm ET, on Zoom. To view the recording, click here.
We talk to Homi Bhabha about the ways Walter Benjamin’s writings have shaped his thinking. How have the fragments collected in the Arcades Project, written between 1927 and 1940, changed his mind?
Homi K. Bhabha is the Anne F. Rothenberg Professor of the Humanities in English and Comparative Literature at Harvard University. He is among the most influential scholars writing on postcolonial theory, cultural change and power, contemporary art, and cosmopolitanism. His works include Nation and Narration and the now classic The Location of Culture. With the support of the Volkswagen and Mellon Foundations, Bhabha is leading a research project on the Global Humanities. He serves on advisory boards of cultural institutions all over the world, has served on the jury of various film festivals, the Venice Biennale among them, and has been curator-in-residence of the Boston Museum of Fine Arts.
Emily Apter (New York University) on Barbara Cassin’s Dictionary of Untranslatables.
Wednesday, March 17, 2021, 4 - 5 pm ET, on Zoom. To view the recording, click here.
One of our foremost theorists of translation, Emily Apter looks to Barbara Cassin’s Dictionary of Untranslatables to learn working, thinking and living beyond the bounds of monolingualism.
Emily Apter is Julius Silver professor of Comparative Literature and French at New York University. Her work has focused on the politics of translation in a set of interlinked books: Unexceptional Politics: On Obstruction, Impasse and the Impolitic; Against World Literature: On the Politics of Untranslatability; and The Translation Zone: A New Comparative Literature. She began engaging with the problem of untranslatability while working on an English edition of The Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon. She is completing a new book, What is Just Translation?
Simon Critchley (The New School for Social Research) on Showings - The Revelations of Divine Love, by Julian of Norwich.
Thursday, April 15, 2021, 4 - 5 pm ET, on Zoom. To register, click here.
Simon Critchley teaches philosophy and writes, but he is temperamentally a mystic and Julian of Norwich is, in his view, the greatest and kindest English mystical writer. In her book Showings - The Revelations of Divine Love, Julian wrote about mystical visions she had in 1373.
Simon Critchley is Hans Jonas Professor at the New School for Social Research. His books include Very Little ... Almost Nothing (1997), Infinitely Demanding (2007), The Book of Dead Philosophers (2009), and The Faith of the Faithless (2012). Recent works include a novella, Memory Theatre, a book-length essay, Notes on Suicide, and studies of David Bowie and Football and Apply-Degger (Onassis, 2020). His most recent book is Tragedy, The Greeks and Us (Pantheon, 2019). He is series moderator of “The Stone,” a philosophy column in The New York Times, and co-editor of The Stone Reader (2016). He is also 50% of an obscure musical combo called Critchley & Simmons. A new book, called Bald, is forthcoming from Yale any day now.
Wendy Brown (UC Berkeley).
Tuesday, May 11, 2021, 4 - 5 pm ET, on Zoom.
Lecture Series on Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations
Sarah Beckwith, Duke University:
“A Vision of Language for Literary Historians."
Saturday, February 6, 2021, 11 am ET. To view the recording, click here.
Abstract: Wittgenstein did not address the question of history directly or extensively. But his vision of language is pervasively historical and has implications for the way we do literary history. This talk examines the idea of use at the heart of Wittgenstein’s vision of language, especially how it differs from the question of context, and how it is related to “forms of life.” After exemplifying these concepts in Wittgenstein, I explore the Oxford English Dictionary to show how the teaching of the differences in the use of words is at the heart of its practice. Finally I highlight the work of an exemplary critic, William Empson, who regarded his work as an important corrective to the OED, and whose work is highly attuned to the history of use. The implications of Wittgenstein’s vision of language with its fundamental revision of linguistic agency show that much contemporary historical criticism is not historical enough.
Sarah Beckwith is the Katherine Everett Gilbert Professor of English at Duke University. She is the author most recently of Shakespeare and the Grammar of Forgiveness (Cornell University Press, 2011), and of numerous essays on literature and Ordinary Language Philosophy in the tradition of Austin, Wittgenstein, and Cavell. She is currently completing a book on Shakespeare and the Ethics of Tragedy and working on another project, The Book of Second Chances, on versos of Shakespeare’s The Winter’s Tale.
Juliet Floyd, Boston University:
"The 'Machine; Self-Symbolizing Its Own Actions."
Saturday, March 13, 11 am ET. Lecture, followed by discussion. View the slides from Juliet Floyd’s talk here.
Abstract: Wittgenstein first composed the remarks on the machine “symbolizing its own actions” (Philosophical Investigations, sections 189ff) after participating in a discussion group with Alan Turing in 1937. The issue of our tendency toward self-mechanization is fundamental to the treatment of meaning and understanding in the Investigations. The rule-following remarks turn, I shall argue, on Wittgenstein’s having brought in, just at the beginning of his turn to his mature style of writing and thinking (1937), the notions of “form of life” and “technique”. This allowed him to resolve a number of problems in his remarks on mathematics that had plagued him since the Tractatus.
Juliet Floyd is Professor of Philosophy at Boston University and President of the Society for the History of Analytical Philosophy. Her recent works include Wittgenstein’s Annotations to Hardy’s A Course of Pure Mathematics: An Investigation of a Non-Extensionalist Understanding of Real Numbers (Springer, 2020, co-authored with Felix Mühlhölzer), Philosophy of Emerging Media (Oxford, 2016, co-edited with James E. Katz) and Philosophical Aspects of the Legacy of Alan Turing (Springer, 2017, co-edited with Alisa Bokulich).
For older events, see here.